Conscious Business, the Planet and Change

Conscious Business, the Planet and Change by Jean-Sébastien Simon.

In 2009, Johan Rockström, then director of the Stockholm Resilience Center lead a group of 28 internationally renowned researchers and proposed a new Earth framework system to measure the planet’s health. It can be used by governments and corporations to know what the “Safe Operating Space for Humanity” is. This space lies below the threshold within nine planetary boundaries (Rockström et Al., 2009a, 2009b ; Richardson et Al, 2023, Sakschewski and Cesar et al. 2025):

Climate change, biosphere integrity, land-system change, freshwater use, biogeochemical use, ocean acidification, atmospheric aerosol loading, stratospheric ozone depletion, chemical pollution and novel entities.

The research indicates that life can still thrive on earth within the thresholds, but that the Earth can shift into a dangerous new state if the thresholds are crossed.

In 2009, we had crossed three of the nine planetary boundaries, and the most recent publication in 2025 showed that we have crossed seven of the nine safety thresholds:

The evolution of the planetary boundaries framework. Licenced under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (Credit: Azote for Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University. Based on Sakschewski and Caesar et al. 2025, Richardson et al. 2023, Steffen et al. 2015, and Rockström et al. 2009).

The 2025 update to the Planetary boundaries. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0. Credit: “Azote for Stockholm Resilience Centre, based on analysis in Sakschewski and Caesar et al. 2025”.

Erin Billman, the executive Director of the Science-Based Targets Network said that the goal is to move toward “the equitable net zero carbon nature-positive future that is needed in the environmental space.”

The space within which Conscious Businesses need to operate has been well defined by this framework, and organizations at different stages of consciousness have taken it into account.

It is encouraging to see that large corporations which we sometimes label as the “bad students” also have positive initiatives, and are growing. For instance, Walmart has a Zero waste initiative and ambitious goals to shift towards a circular economy by 2025 in the US, Canada and Japan (source).

For mastodons like that, change takes time, and a 1% decrease in their waste production – as they did in 2017 – means a large impact down the road. Yet, the concerns about greenwashing remain valid and helpful to help the mastodons be more in integrity with who they claim they want to become.

To help in that direction, the marketing agency TerraChoice defined Seven Sins of Greenwashing (source):

#1 Sin of the Hidden Trade-Off

#2 Sin of No Proof

#3 Sin of Vagueness

#4 Sin of Worshipping False Labels

#5 Sin of Irrelevance

#6 Sin of Lesser of Two Evils

#7 Sin of Fibbing.

They conducted a study in Canada and the U.S. in 2008-2009 which showed that 98% of the products tested committed at least one of these 7 sins of greenwashing.

Many certifications exist to track and trace the claims of companies for environmental friendliness (think Fair Trade, different Organic labels, and others).

In a Conscious Business, the game changes completely. Indeed, most unconscious companies try to compensate for activities they are carrying out, to “minimize their impact.”, while their main mission remains with a limited Purpose. For instance, BP states that “Our purpose is reimagining energy for people and our planet. We want to help the world reach net zero and improve people’s lives. 

We will aim to dramatically reduce carbon in our operations and in our production, and grow new low carbon businesses, products and services.“ Yet, despite that stated purpose, most of today’s revenue come from fossil fuel consumption. BP has announced that it intends to cut by 40% it’s oil and gas production by 2030 (source).

Companies are developing regenerative business models, such as Interface Inc., which designs carbon-negative flooring solutions through circular production and biomimicry; Danone, which is transforming its supply chains through regenerative agriculture that restores soil health, biodiversity, and water cycles; and Patagonia, which integrates environmental restoration into its core mission by funding grassroots activism, promoting circular consumption, and committing its ownership structure to protecting the planet and 4ocean, which removes plastic waste from oceans and coastlines through a business model directly tied to funding large-scale marine ecosystem restoration.

NGOs are also essential actors contributing with innovation, such as The Ocean Cleanup, whose goal is to have filtered and recycled 90% of the Ocean’s plastic waste through it’s technologies.

To get a clearer picture of different organizations commitment to the Planet, we can distinguish 4 levels of Planetary Consciousness of organizations based on the Planetary Service they provide to Earth:

Levels of Planetary awareness of organizations

Note that in Level 4 organizations, greenwashing is impossible since the explicit Purpose of the organization itself is to make the Planet a cleaner place. They are the standard setters.

For instance, the non-profit Sadhana Forest is a vegan community which creates afforestation and reforestation projects in India, Haiti and Kenya through highly effective permaculture-based practices. They too would be an example of a Level 4 organization.

Brands such as Patagonia have already shown their commitment, by donating 1% of their sales to the preservation and restoration of the natural environment. For Patagonia, this has resulted in a total of $89 million donated to grassroots environmental groups making a difference in their local communities.

When President Trump cut corporate taxes during his first mandate, Patagonia donated the 10 million USD in savings to environmental groups. Another example is the brand Seventh Generation which was nominated in the Top 50 most sustainable brands in the world.

Their motto:

Obviously, businesses which have a positive impact on the planet, and are aware and working on reducing their negative impact will be more sustainable in the long term. Furthermore, this contributes directly to the well-being of the employees (the Psyche). Businesses which could develop symbiotically with Nature offer long term gains and prosperity.

In this sense, innovations and practices such as biomimicry, carbon offsetting (with its three phases of carbon reduction, carbon neutrality, and carbon positivity), circular economy, upcycling, and renewable energies are great avenues for creating a more synergetic relationship between business and planet.

Organizations can evolve from a Level 4 Organization to a Level 1 type. What kind of organization would you like to work with? What would it take for you to be a change agent within your existing organization?

Jean-Sébastien Simon
Jean-Sébastien Simon

The Council on Business & Society (CoBS), visionary in its conception and purpose, was created in 2011, and is dedicated to promoting responsible leadership and tackling issues at the crossroads of business, society, and planet including the dimensions of sustainability, diversity, social impact, social enterprise, employee wellbeing, ethical finance, ethical leadership and the place responsible business has to play in contributing to the common good.  

Member schools of the Council on Business & Society.

The schools of the Council on Business & Society (CoBS)


Discover more from Council on Business & Society Insights

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.