Master in Management student at ESSEC Business School, Mingyou Yuan, writes on how certain CEO practices can help politicians improve public services, while highlighting the risks of importing a for-profit mindset into government.

When Elon Musk acquired Twitter in 2022 and rebranded it as X, many people saw it as more than just a social media purchase. By calling it a “digital town square” and plunging into debates over free speech and governance, Musk presented the question of whether politicians can learn something valuable from CEOs. Corporate leaders are often viewed as practical and result-oriented, but does that automatically make them effective at leading nations or cities?

In this article, we will examine how certain CEO practices—such as agility, data-driven decisions, and compelling storytelling—can help politicians improve public service. We will also explore the risks of importing a for-profit mindset into government, where long-term, inclusive goals do not always align with short-term metrics and shareholder returns.

Where CEOs and Politicians Overlap

Briefly, CEOs are responsible for making their companies profitable, while politicians serve to protect citizens and uphold public welfare. Nonetheless, these two roles share several similarities. Both require strong leadership, communication skills, and the ability to navigate crises under constant scrutiny. Tim Cook at Apple, for instance, must balance quarterly investor expectations with the brand’s long-term reputation. Elected officials face a similar tension: they must respond to immediate voter demands but also plan for the future of the communities they serve.

Despite these parallels, politicians deal with objectives that are more complex and far harder to measure than corporate earnings. Public goals such as social equity or national security can’t be reduced to simple profit-and-loss statements. South Korea’s transformation from a war-torn state to a high-tech hub took decades of careful policymaking. Most executives do not have to wait that long to prove success to investors.

Three CEO Strategies Worth Learning

1. Agility: Moving Fast, but Not Alone

Startups and tech companies often talk about “moving fast and iterating.” They test new ideas in small batches, gather feedback, then pivot quickly if something is not working. Politicians could adopt similar approaches to address pressing issues, whether it involves education reform or healthcare. Estonia, for example, has embraced digital governance. Its electronic ID system allows citizens to access various government services online, speeding up tasks like filing taxes or applying for social benefits. By reducing red tape, Estonia improved not only efficiency but also citizen satisfaction.

Yet agility does not mean ignoring democratic checks. Politicians need transparency and public consultation to build trust. Quick experiments are helpful, but they should not undermine broader accountability. Government decisions affect millions of people, so significant policy shifts need inclusive debate, even if they slow things down.

2. Data: A Valuable Compass, If Used Correctly

Netflix famously uses data to decide which shows to produce, leading to a stream of original programming that aligns well with viewer interests. In a similar way, some governments are beginning to rely on data to set priorities. By analyzing real-time statistics on issues like housing, healthcare, or education, officials can identify which problems require urgent attention. This can help direct limited budgets more efficiently.

Data can also reveal patterns that might otherwise go unnoticed. It can show, for example, that a policy benefits one group much more than another, raising questions of fairness. Nevertheless, it is important to avoid the trap of “data worship,” where leaders focus only on what is easily measured and ignore deeper social factors. For instance, GDP can grow while income inequality worsens. When politicians rely too heavily on certain metrics, they might overlook the human impact of their decisions, such as the social costs of job displacement or environmental harm.

3. Storytelling: Unifying People with a Vision

Many CEOs excel at crafting a narrative that resonates with customers, employees, and investors. Steve Jobs, for example, made “Think Different” into a powerful story that energized Apple’s brand. Storytelling can be just as potent in politics. A compelling message inspires unity and can mobilize citizens to support new initiatives, such as infrastructure investment or social reforms.

However, political storytelling must be grounded in reality and aimed at inclusivity. Narratives built on anger, nostalgia, or fear can divide a society rather than bring it together. Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” slogan motivated many voters but also contributed to polarization. Politicians who learn from CEOs in this regard should recognize that while a unifying story can be transformative, it can also be destructive if it relies on misleading information or scapegoating.

When Business Logic Undermines Public Good

Although CEOs can offer valuable insights on leadership, efficiency, and communication, there are real dangers in directly applying corporate principles to public governance. Two examples show how this can fail.

Michael Bloomberg’s Campaign:

In 2020, Michael Bloomberg spent over 400 million dollars of his personal fortune on a campaign for the U.S. presidency. He relied heavily on advertising and hired top campaign staff, resembling a corporate strategy to capture market share. However, he failed to connect with most voters on a personal level and soon dropped out. Elections are not purely transactional, and trust or authenticity cannot be purchased like a commercial product.

Elon Musk and Twitter:

Elon Musk’s approach to Twitter, now known as X, involved sudden cost-cutting and sweeping layoffs. While this might be a rational tactic in certain corporate settings, it proved disruptive to a global communication platform. Content moderation weakened, and misinformation surged. If governments mirrored these actions, the rapid removal of public services could cause lasting harm, especially for vulnerable populations. Musk’s mixed interests, including seeking support for his electric vehicle ventures, also highlight the risk of conflicts between private business goals and the broader public interest.

A government’s purpose is to uphold the welfare of all citizens and preserve a stable society. Short-term fixes, like abrupt budget cuts or purely profit-driven decisions, can damage trust in public institutions and weaken social cohesion. This caution applies even to wealthy individuals who hope to enter politics believing that strong business acumen alone is enough.

Rare Successes and Why They Remain Exceptions:

There are cases where business-oriented individuals have managed to transition into political leadership. Take Silvio Berlusconi as an example. Once a media tycoon who built a vast business empire, Berlusconi later entered politics and became Italy’s prime minister. Although his tenure was marked by controversies and legal challenges, his rise demonstrated that entrepreneurial experience can sometimes provide a basis for political influence.

However, these successes are exceptions rather than the rule. The skills and mindset that lead to corporate profitability do not always address the many ethical and social complexities governments face. Setting interest rates or restructuring a corporation differs from running a nation. When CEOs step into public office, the potential conflict between personal financial interests and the public good demands far more oversight, transparency, and personal restraint than in most private enterprises.

Balancing Efficiency and Inclusion

We live in a world where people often wish their governments could be as nimble and effective as innovative companies. There is merit in that view. Politicians can learn to be more agile by testing policies on a small scale before rolling them out. They can use data to gain more accurate insights and make better decisions. They can also communicate more effectively by crafting inspiring stories that bring communities together.

Yet politicians must remember that public service extends beyond the goals of efficiency, growth, or competitiveness. Governments are expected to protect rights, promote equality, and nurture a sense of collective well-being. These objectives do not align neatly with the investor-driven logic of short-term profit. Moreover, democracy thrives on accountability and representation, values that can clash with unilateral corporate decision-making.

By selectively adopting elements of CEO management while preserving democratic standards and social responsibility, politicians can take advantage of corporate best practices without losing sight of the broader purpose of governance. Learning to “move fast and iterate” might indeed help solve pressing policy challenges, so long as leaders remain committed to the inclusive, long-term vision that a democratic society requires.

Useful links:

• Link up with Mingyou Yuan on LinkedIn
• Read a related article: What can Politicians Learn from those Leading the World’s most Successful Organisations?
• Read this article and other competition winners in the special issue Global Voice magazine #32
• Discover ESSEC Business School
• Apply for the ESSEC Global MBA.

Learn more about the Council on Business & Society

The Council on Business & Society (CoBS), visionary in its conception and purpose, was created in 2011, and is dedicated to promoting responsible leadership and tackling issues at the crossroads of business, society, and planet including the dimensions of sustainability, diversity, social impact, social enterprise, employee wellbeing, ethical finance, ethical leadership and the place responsible business has to play in contributing to the common good.  

• Follow the CoBS on LinkedIn
• Download magazines and learning content from the CoBS website downloads page.

Member schools of the Council on Business & Society.

• ESSEC Business School, France, Singapore, Morocco
• FGV-EAESP, Brazil
• School of Management Fudan University, China
• IE Business School, Spain
• Indian Institute of Management Bangalore, India
• Keio Business School, Japan
• Monash Business School, Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia
• Olin Business School, USA
• Smith School of Business, Queen’s University, Canada
• Stellenbosch Business School, South Africa
• Trinity Business School, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
• Warwick Business School, United Kingdom.