Prof. Anita Bosch at Stellenbosch Business School explores the hidden paradoxes of diversity, equality, and inclusion. As fairness, merit, and need collide, and as organisations wrestle with scarce resources, clashing values, and shifting timelines, good intentions can quickly unravel. The fix? Embracing paradoxical thinking and treating complexity not as a barrier but as the path to more authentic DEI.

Navigating the Maze: The inherent paradoxes of workplace justice in DEI by CoBS Editor Hari Chandana Chinni. Related research: Organizational and social justice paradoxes in EDI, Anita Bosch, 2024, Frontiers in Psychology, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1320993.

The terms diversity, equality, and inclusion (DEI) are now commonly used in business. Billions are invested in policies and training aimed at creating fairer workplaces. It is frequently regarded as the morally correct thing to do, an indication of progressive leadership, and a means of demonstrating that a business genuinely supports justice. Yet those who have tried to put DEI into practice know it is anything but simple. On the ground, it often feels far more complicated than the motivational slogans suggest – messy, full of tensions, and riddled with contradictions.

Prof. Anita Bosch of Stellenbosch Business School cautions against treating DEI as a box-ticking exercise or a neat standard of fairness. In her view, workplace justice is often contradictory and intrinsically complicated. Rather than depending on short-term solutions or memorable campaigns, she challenges executives to face a more difficult truth: justice at work is rarely straightforward. It unfolds in layers, is constantly contested, and sometimes produces contradictions rather than clarity.

The Three Pillars of Justice and Why they Crack Under Pressure

According to Bosch, workplace justice traditionally rests on three pillars:

• Distributive – Are rewards and resources fair?
• Procedural – Are decisions made in a fair way?
• Interactional – Are people treated with respect and dignity?

But when organisations try to achieve social justice goals like DEI, these pillars face an extra challenge. Leaders must juggle three often-competing principles:

1. Merit
We all agree people should be rewarded for hard work but there’s a catch. Bosch points out that our idea of “merit” is often shaped by old rules that favoured certain types of people. If we only reward past achievements, we risk reinforcing historical privilege. True social justice also means looking at future potential, investing in people from marginalized groups who haven’t had the same chances to prove themselves. The tension? Rewarding achievement versus correcting historical wrongs.

2. Equality
Everyone wants equality, but Bosch is clear: equality isn’t about everyone being treated the same. It’s about understanding the difference between:

• Equality of opportunity – everyone starts at the same line.
• Equality of outcome – everyone finishes at the same time.

A truly fair workplace often leans toward equity giving different supports to account for different starting points. To someone who’s always had a head start, this can feel like special treatment.

3. Need
Should a company provide a lactation room, software for a blind employee, or a living wage because it’s the right thing to do or just because it’s generous? Bosch explains this distinction is critical. When needs are met as charity, it creates a power imbalance. When they are recognised as a right, it builds dignity. But in tough economic times, it’s easy to get stuck wondering what’s affordable versus what’s morally required.

In short, even the strongest pillars of justice can wobble under pressure. Leaders must navigate these tensions carefully, balancing merit, equality, and need while keeping the humanity of their employees at the centre.

Why this isn’t just an HR Problem

When these paradoxes are ignored, DEI initiatives don’t just fail quietly – they can backfire spectacularly. They breed resentment, fuel perceptions of reverse discrimination, and erode trust in leadership. Employees aren’t fooled by rhetoric that doesn’t match reality.

For managers and executives, Bosch’s work is a wake-up call. It shows that implementing DEI isn’t like following a recipe. It’s more like being a judge, constantly weighing competing claims. Do we prioritize the immediate merit of our current team or the potential of a more diverse pipeline? Do we aim for equal treatment or equitable support? There are no easy answers, and pretending otherwise is a recipe for failure.

The Four Paradoxes every Leader Must Face

Bosch crystallizes these tensions into four unavoidable paradoxes that define the modern leader’s dilemma:

• The Paradox of Need: Is fulfilling an employee’s need a core obligation of justice, or an act of charitable generosity? The answer changes based on the company’s financial health, placing a moral burden on leaders that goes far beyond the balance sheet.
• The Paradox of Social Value: DEI assumes everyone agrees on what’s “right.” But values are deeply cultural and contested. What looks like progressive inclusion in one context can be seen as imposing foreign values in another.
• The Paradox of the Productive Economy: Inclusion works when the pie is growing. In economies with high unemployment and scarce jobs, hiring from marginalized groups can feel like a painful game of musical chairs simply replacing one group with another. This turns DEI into a source of conflict rather than solidarity.
• The Paradox of Time: Workplace justice demands short-term results keeping the peace and boosting productivity now. Social justice is a long-term project of rebuilding broken systems. Leaders are caught between the immediate pressure to perform and the long-term duty to repair.

Facing Complexity Head-On

Prof. Bosch suggests that organisations need to embrace paradox rather than avoid it. This means being open about trade-offs, explaining decisions clearly, and preparing managers to live with competing demands. Tools such as case studies, scenario planning and leadership training can help leaders deal with contradictions honestly instead of brushing them aside.

At its best, DEI reshapes workplaces into places where fairness and inclusion feel real. But that requires courage from leaders to admit that justice is messy, contested, and constantly shifting. Those who face that reality with openness are far more likely to create DEI programmes that last.

Useful links:

• Link up with Prof. Anita Bosch on LinkedIn
• Read a related article: Inclusion: The DNA, not the department 
• Discover Stellenbosch Business School
• Apply for the Stellenbosch MBA.

Learn more about the Council on Business & Society

The Council on Business & Society (CoBS), visionary in its conception and purpose, was created in 2011, and is dedicated to promoting responsible leadership and tackling issues at the crossroads of business, society, and planet including the dimensions of sustainability, diversity, social impact, social enterprise, employee wellbeing, ethical finance, ethical leadership and the place responsible business has to play in contributing to the common good.  

• Follow the CoBS on LinkedIn
• Download magazines and learning content from the CoBS website downloads page.

Member schools of the Council on Business & Society.

• ESSEC Business School, France, Singapore, Morocco
• FGV-EAESP, Brazil
• School of Management Fudan University, China
• IE Business School, Spain
• Indian Institute of Management Bangalore, India
• Keio Business School, Japan
• Monash Business School, Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia
• Olin Business School, USA
• Smith School of Business, Queen’s University, Canada
• Stellenbosch Business School, South Africa
• Trinity Business School, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
• Warwick Business School, United Kingdom.