AI can be both a promising tool and a potential risk in management. It enhances workplace efficiency and job satisfaction, but also raises concerns of privacy invasion and the risk of excessive surveillance. Antonin Delobre, finalist in the 2024 CoBS CSR Student Article Competition at ESSEC Business School explores.

In the movie TRON, Ed Dillinger’s confession, “It’s my fault. I programmed you to want too much” echoes a timeless caution against human hubris and insatiable greed. This poignant admission not only encapsulates the perennial tale of creator and creation. It also serves as a stark reflection of our own technological trajectory, especially within the realms of artificial intelligence in people management. As we stand on the brink of an AI-infused future, this quote resonates more profoundly than ever. Moreover, it highlights the delicate balance between leveraging AI for progress and the potential amplification of power disparities.

In the corporate sphere, AI promises unparalleled efficiency and insights, offering leaders tools of unprecedented influence and control. Yet, as we imbue these digital entities with the desire to learn, optimise, and outperform, we must ask ourselves: Are we programming our own obsolescence? The allure of AI in people management, while transformative, brings to light the inherent risks of a future. Where the concentration of power could escalate beyond our control.

This narrative is not just a cautionary tale of technology run but a reflection on our own tendencies to seek dominion over nature and each other. As we integrate AI more deeply into the fabric of our organisations, the question becomes not only about the capabilities we gain but also about the values we choose to prioritise. Will the story of our advancement be one of unchecked ambition leading to our forfeiture, or will we navigate this new frontier with a mindful appreciation of the responsibilities that come with great power?

In contemplating the future of AI in people management, we are reminded that the most profound challenges we face may not come from the machines themselves. However, it comes from the very human traits we program into them. As we stand at this crossroads, it is imperative that we proceed with a blend of ambition and humility. To ensure that our technological endeavours enhance, rather than eclipse, the human being.

AI and Discrimination: A disturbing love story

The arrival of artificial intelligence (AI) in the recruitment processes of certain major corporations such as Unilever and Amazon, has injected a wave of optimism across a segment of society. This part of society who faces discrimination in hiring, encounters difficulties in securing employment that is satisfying or any employment at all.

To elaborate, a plethora of start-ups have sought to digitise and automate various layers of the recruitment process. They make it swifter, more cost-effective, and less prone to discrimination—a matter of significant concern to companies of Anglo-Saxon cultural heritage. Certain of these tools have incontrovertibly proven their worth. For instance, Unilever’s use of the HireVue solution, which facilitates video interviews, stands out.

In this setup, candidates are presented with questions on their screen to which they must respond. The system employs artificial intelligence to compile and analyse each individual’s responses against those of previous applicants. The analysis scrutinises responses in light of traits identified in the most successful candidates, including aspects such as breathing, vocabulary, eye movements, speech rate, emotional tone, and stress levels in the voice—to name but a few. Over 15,000 attributes can potentially be identified in top performers.

The outcomes regarding Unilever have been universally positive, yet some initiatives have not yielded equally convincing results. Amazon’s experience, in particular, could be described as catastrophic and somewhat alarming. In 2015, Amazon introduced a new recruitment tool based on machine learning. Despite its innovative nature at the time, it was quickly called into question due to its apparent bias towards male candidates. As the algorithm predominantly selected male profiles.

Although this episode occurred nine years ago, it remains indicative of a clear lack of neutrality in the development of AI algorithms, extending beyond the realm of people management. This is evident in the controversies surrounding the ‘woke’ tendencies of Google’s Gemini and certain responses from ChatGPT, which have ignited debates on platforms such as Twitter and Reddit for their perceived biases.

Having explored the intricate dance between AI’s promise to revolutionise recruitment and its potential to perpetuate biases. We now turn our gaze forward. The future of work, illuminated by the insights of experts and union leaders. It beckons us to consider not only the technological innovations on the horizon but also the human touch that will guide their integration.

Navigating the Future of Work: Embracing AI with a human touch

In an era where artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the landscape of work, the narrative is often bifurcated between apprehension and optimism. Experts from the French CNAM highlight a perspective that is gaining traction among trade union leaders. One that embraces AI’s potential to optimise production without sacrificing jobs, reduce accident risks, and elevate professions to more rewarding tasks.

This optimistic stance, however, unveils a significant structural challenge: How do we prepare and support workers for the AI revolution? The burden falls on company managers to ponder and enact training and acculturation strategies. Ensuring teams remain abreast of AI advancements. A collaborative approach with sector experts can help demystify AI. By teaching employees to leverage intelligent tools for automating redundant tasks and boosting productivity. Practical applications, such as utilising GPT-4 for drafting memos or employing AI-powered customer call filtering solutions, exemplify the time-saving benefits of these technologies.

Central to the AI, the acculturation process is meticulous training for those in management and employee well-being roles. Human Resources departments, therefore, play a crucial role in this technological pivot. Ensuring a smooth transition to intelligent and judicious use of AI involves reassuring communications from HR to employees and unions concerned about job security.

The challenges AI poses to social dialogue are significant. As it impacts future job definitions, autonomy, responsibility, and privacy. AI also questions the worker’s position relative to machines, thereby touching on the dignity of employees in the face of automation. The two main fears to be debunked are the dread of “replacement” and the anxiety of “substitution”.

As we stand on the brink of this new era, the mission of acculturation to AI in the workplace becomes not just about embracing new technologies. It is now about fostering an environment where human dignity, job satisfaction, and technological advancement coexist. The future of work is not about choosing between humans or machines but about integrating both to create a more efficient, safe, and fulfilling workplace. Through informed dialogue, targeted training, and a commitment to employee welfare, businesses can navigate the AI revolution. By ensuring that their workforce is not only prepared for the changes ahead but also capable of thriving in an increasingly automated world.

The journey through AI’s role in optimising and humanising the workplace reveals a significant structural challenge: preparing and supporting our workforce for this digital evolution. Yet, as we embrace these advancements, we must also confront an emerging concern. One that threatens to overshadow AI’s benefits—a concern that harks back to timeless tales of surveillance and privacy.

The Orwellian Conundrum in the Workplace

In the absence of adequate safeguards, the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace can infringe upon employee privacy. Or worse and foster a “Big Brother” atmosphere, potentially breeding resentment among teams.

AI in the corporate sphere: a rear-window? The latest performance analysis tools boast frightening efficiency but also raise concerns over their overreliance on quantifiable facts. Much like James Stewart in “Rear Window,” performance analysis software and other AI-driven tools scrutinise employees’ actions with precision. Yet, something crucial is missing (to extend the Hitchcockian analogy): the sound, which in this context represents the unquantifiable factors that define an employee beyond mere numbers.

Excessive use of these tools can therefore hinder a company’s operations and becomes a source of worry for every employee. It could lead them to question, “Am I performing well enough? Does my work satisfy Big Brother?” It’s clear that the rise of these tools alone does not perpetuate an Orwellian atmosphere in businesses and society at large. AI, in general, has the unique ability to blur the lines further between professional and private life. While introducing more sophisticated surveillance tools. Some are seen as security measures (e.g CCTV with facial recognition). Others aim to boost productivity (e.g., analysis of telework webcams). However, this raises a significant trust issue regarding companies. In fact, given current computer capabilities, they could very well listen in on their own employees at home (using background microphone and camera access).

These two examples of AI utilisation are distinctly dystopian. Thus, demand cautious handling by stakeholders in businesses to avoid creating a professional environment reminiscent of “The Circle” (James Ponsoldt, 2017) or a more absolutist example like 1984 by George Orwell.

This emerging issue requires a thoughtful approach to integrate AI into the workplace. By ensuring that technology enhances productivity without compromising the privacy and dignity of employees. Striking the right balance between leveraging AI for its benefits and maintaining a trustful, respectful work environment is crucial for the future of work.

AI in Human Resources: A double-edged sword

Is the investment in AI, particularly within people management, truly worthwhile? The answer is complex, especially when considering AI’s dual role as both a facilitator of unbiased recruitment and a potential perpetuator of conformity.

AI promises to revolutionize recruitment by eliminating biases—whether based on race, gender, or emotion—and personalizing the selection process. And matching the expectations of both candidates and companies more accurately than a human recruiter ever could. Its superiority in processing applications and drawing nuanced conclusions from vast amounts of data is undisputed. However, the reliance on extensive datasets can be a double-edged sword. As it may inadvertently promote conformity and overlook unconventional or rare profiles, leading to the systemic exclusion of individuals who don’t fit the “norm.”

Beyond the potential for biased outcomes, AI lacks the human capacity for emotional intelligence. It cannot gauge the personal “fit” that is crucial in determining whether a prospective employee will fit with the team, a factor that significantly influences hiring decisions. Incorporating team dynamics into the algorithm could further complicate the recruitment process. Raising the question of who ultimately makes the hiring decision and bears responsibility for it. If managers are forced to double-check the AI’s selections, it reduces the system to a mere pre-screening tool.

Another foreseeable challenge is the regulatory limitations on using personal data. As AI require detailed information to refine candidate profiles, they risk running afoul of privacy laws and could become targets for legal action. Furthermore, the high costs and significant energy consumption associated with running sophisticated AI algorithms add to the overall expense of the recruitment process when considering the total cost.

As we navigate the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and people management, we’re met with a critical balance. AI offers exciting possibilities to enhance efficiency and innovate our workspaces. Yet, it also presents challenges, particularly around privacy and the risk of overly intrusive oversight.

Our exploration, from considering human ambition in technology to evaluating AI’s impact on the workplace, brings us to a clear conclusion. The integration of AI into people management isn’t just about technological advancement. It is about ensuring that these advancements support and respect the dignity of every employee.

In moving forward, the aim should be to harness AI as a tool for improvement, not surveillance. This journey requires careful consideration to ensure that technology serves us, enhancing work life without compromising our values. Ultimately, AI should be a partner in our progress, reflecting our ingenuity and humanity.

Useful links:

• Link up with Antonin Delobre on LinkedIn
• Read a related article: Beyond the Hype – What managers need to ask before adopting AI tools.
• Discover ESSEC Business School
• Apply for the GBBA programme at ESSEC. 

Learn more about the Council on Business & Society

The Council on Business & Society (The CoBS), visionary in its conception and purpose, was created in 2011, and is dedicated to promoting responsible leadership and tackling issues at the crossroads of business and society including sustainability, diversity, ethical leadership and the place responsible business has to play in contributing to the common good.  

• Follow the CoBS on X and LinkedIn
• Download this magazine and others from the CoBS website downloads page.

Member schools of the Council on Business & Society.

• ESSEC Business School, France, Singapore, Morocco
• FGV-EAESP, Brazil
• School of Management Fudan University, China
• IE Business School, Spain
• Keio Business School, Japan
• Monash Business School, Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia
• Olin Business School, USA
• Smith School of Business, Queen’s University, Canada
• Stellenbosch Business School, South Africa
• Trinity Business School, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
• Warwick Business School, United Kingdom.