Anne-Claire Pache, Professor at ESSEC Business School, Chaired Professor in Philanthropy and co-founder of the ESSEC Social Entrepreneurship Chair, shares her expertise on setting effective objectives and strategy for your corporate giving.
Corporate Giving: It’s not what you have, but the way that you give it by Tom Gamble and Anne-Claire Pache. Related research: Book chapter: Giving in France: A philanthropic renewal after decades of distrust“: Gautier, A., Pache, A.-C., & Mossel, V.
For several decades, philanthropic activity has been growing in France. Companies are part of this development, and they engage in numerous “corporate giving” practices. The evolution is reflected in a growing number of corporate foundations and dynamic initiatives such as ADMICAL which promote and encourage the development of corporate sponsorship in France.
These signs of growth are certainly excellent news, since they mean more resources for the common good. However, firms should still be asking themselves some important questions: Are funds being well-used? Is corporate philanthropy “effective”, socially speaking?
This is a complex issue, particularly because of the complexity of assessing the impact of philanthropy. We can, however, identify two key steps to formalize an effective philanthropic strategy.
Corporate Giving: Defining your philanthropic objectives
Defining a philanthropic intervention strategy is first and foremost about choosing the cause you will support! For firms, answering this question means both looking inside the company (what do we care about?), and outside the company (what are the societal needs to which we can contribute effectively?).
Going deeper, looking within the firm raises a further set of questions: What drives the company’s commitment? What are its distinctive values? What company traits or expertise could lend themselves positively to society? What motivates employees?
Looking outside, companies should ask: what are the most important or urgent needs? What are the areas in which these needs are most present? Apart from us, who are the other relevant players? How are we well positioned to respond?
In this first strategic phase, another important question arises: Should we specialize and choose to focus on a single cause or tackle several causes at once? While there is no absolute rule in this area, a form of specialization is recommended so that companies can develop in-depth expertise.
Corporate Giving: Defining a strategy for roll out
Once the objectives have been defined, a philanthropic strategy can be broken down into a few broad categories:
- Companies must first define how to select the beneficiaries of their donations. This is never an easy decision to make! That’s why it’s important for companies to develop a philosophy on how they will allocate their donations to individuals or associations.
- Sponsors must also determine the amount of donations to be made to their beneficiaries. Should small sums be donated to many beneficiaries or large sums to a few beneficiaries? Generally, it’s wise to avoid scattering donations – giving among too many beneficiaries tends to reduce the social impact.
- Another important decision for donors is the type of activity to support. Should we favor projects? Or investments? Or operating costs? It is rare to make a donation without making this kind of decision. It is important, therefore, to understand the implications of these choices.
- A fourth important question concerns the duration of support: How long should a donator commit itself to beneficiaries? This notion of commitment over time is often linked to the nature of the activities being financed: project support allows a donator to commit only in the short term, whereas for a donator who has chosen to support an organization over several years, operating costs may be incurred to support.
- To this question of the duration we add the degree of commitment. What relationship should be developed with beneficiaries? For example, a relationship could be strictly remote whereby contact is limited. Other relationships can necessitate frequent and intense interactions during which teams work closely with the beneficiary.
- Finally, a donator must ask the question: What is the degree of control I want to exercise over the recipients of my donations? Should I control only where funds are allocated, or should I concentrate on their societal impact as well?
Today, there is no doubt that a company needs a strategy to effectively achieve its philanthropy objectives. As European firms increasingly invest in philanthropy and, more generally, in private philanthropy, it is important to recognize the importance of developing rigorous and coherent philanthropic strategies that take social impact into consideration.
Useful links:
- Link up with Anne-Claire Pache on LinkedIn
- Read related article: Women’s philanthropy: The end of an invisible phenomenon?
Book chapter: Giving in France: A philanthropic renewal after decades of distrust“: Gautier, A., Pache, A.-C., & Mossel, V.- List of academic articles from the ESSEC Philanthropy Chair
Learn more about the Council on Business & Society
The Council on Business & Society (The CoBS), visionary in its conception and purpose, was created in 2011, and is dedicated to promoting responsible leadership and tackling issues at the crossroads of business and society including sustainability, diversity, ethical leadership and the place responsible business has to play in contributing to the common good.
Member schools are all “Triple Crown” accredited AACSB, EQUIS and AMBA and leaders in their respective countries.
- ESSEC Business School, France-Singapore-Morocco
- FGV-EAESP, Brazil
- School of Management Fudan University, China
- IE Business School, Spain
- Keio Business School, Japan
- Stellenbosch Business School, South Africa
- Trinity Business School, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
- Warwick Business School, United Kingdom.
